Project Grant: Spring 2021 Peer review participants

The peer review process relies on the time and dedication of experts across the health research spectrum. For the Spring 2021 Project Grant competition, a total of 1390 individuals* (including Chairs [61], Scientific Officers [120], reviewers [1212]) participated in 61 peer review committees. There were also 122 early career researcher (ECR) Reviewers in Training present during the peer review process.

*Note: Some individuals played multiple roles, such as chairing one review panel and then acting as a peer reviewer in another, which is why the role counts may not add up to 1390.

Approximately 84% (1179) of the committee members are members of the College of Reviewers, which has specific membership selection criteria. As a first step, CIHR staff provided lists of suggested reviewers based on specific selection criteria, and then all reviewers were vetted by committee Chairs and Scientific Officers.

Peer review participants by sex

  Female Male Undeclared
participated 609 participated 797 participated 4 participated
invited 1528 invited to participate 1916 invited to participate 5 invited to participate
accepted 693 accepted (45.4% acceptance rate) 920 accepted (48.0% acceptance rate) 4 accepted (80.0% acceptance rate)

The figures above exclude ECR Reviewers in Training.

Participants by region

The following table is based on the region information of the individual’s institution. The table includes all peer review participants, excluding ECR Reviewers in Training.

Province Invited Accepted Acceptance Rate Participated
British Columbia 383 168 43.9% 143
Alberta 367 179 48.8% 165
Saskatchewan 61 30 49.2% 26
Manitoba 127 59 46.5% 50
Ontario 1324 666 50.3% 583
Québec 945 403 42.6% 340
New Brunswick 18 14 77.8% 12
Nova Scotia 101 48 47.5% 42
Prince Edward Island 2 2 100.0% 2
Newfoundland and Labrador 21 10 47.6% 10
North West Territories 4 1 25.0% 1
International 83 34 41.0% 33
No region specified 13 3 23.1% 3

Participants by pillar

The following table is based on the self-reported primary research pillar of peer review participants, excluding ECR Reviewers in Training.

Pillar Participants Proportion
Biomedical (Pillar 1) 761 54.0%
Clinical (Pillar 2) 243 17.2%
Health Systems/Services (Pillar 3) 120 8.5%
Social/Cultural/Environmental/Population Health (Pillar 4) 153 10.9%
Uncategorized 133 9.4%

Note: The proportions of peer review participants by pillar reflect the types of applications submitted to the competition. For more information, please visit the competition results page.

Date modified: